Accord Accordance Agreement

In agreement, it is to agree with someone or something. I fully agree with you on the amendments to the directive. in accordance with the average, in accordance with something; in agreement with something. In agreement with our discussion, I have prepared a treaty more is very difficult to explain the difference, but okay, it means that you agree with something and means in agreement that something else happened because of an agreement of something else, so that it arrived too late according to the rules if it is suspended. I hope this helps a little it is difficult to explain, but good question What made you check in agreement with? Please let us know where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible). “Agree with.” Merriam-Webster.com dictionary, merriam weaver, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20accord%20with. Called November 27, 2020. Agreement is synonymous with agreement or harmony – for example, the terrorist ideologue Osama bin Laden was buried at sea according to Islamic custom. [Wall Street Journal] Agree with -This sentence normally refers to technical topics. This means that an act complies with or derives from existing rules, laws or expectations.

Under the new School Fraud Directive, students were unable to use mobile phones during the test. All employees must wear a hat or coloured socks three times a week, in accordance with Article 1(8) of the Clown Constitution. Agree with – This phrase has a similar meaning to “in agreement with”, but is often less technical and precise. It`s a little more human. It is used to express coherence, harmony or unity with other people or principles. We should learn to protect the environment and live in harmony with nature. The children were sad when their parents were not in harmony. Sometimes the two sentences are synonymous and mean exactly the same thing. However, it was found that other aspects of the prosecution were not carried out in accordance with police guidelines. [New Zealand Herald] Note: Concordance in this sense is often used to introduce a case or authority that corresponds to the cited case or the cited authority, as for example in a sentence such as “.

a decision based on just principles. Smith v. Jones, 1 F.2d 2 (1900). I want to see examples of that. With the three examples you cite, it doesn`t work for me – I`d read “after” as an imputation, I`d realize it couldn`t be right, and then I`d get the meaning I wanted by elimination. I would feel that the author was at least very ruthless and probably just wrong. .

Наверх