What Was The Purpose Of The Paris Agreement And What Are Some Of Its Weaknesses

The Paris Agreement is an environmental agreement that was adopted by almost all nations in 2015 to combat climate change and its negative effects. The agreement aims to significantly reduce global greenhouse gas emissions in order to limit global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels this century, while continuing to pursue ways to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees. The agreement provides for the commitment of all major emitters to reduce their pollution from climate change and to strengthen these commitments over time. It provides developed countries with a means to assist developing countries in their mitigation and adaptation efforts and establishes a framework for monitoring, reporting and strengthening countries` individual and collective climate goals. The Kyoto Protocol, a pioneering environmental treaty adopted at COP3 in Japan in 1997, is the first time nations have agreed on country-by-country emission reduction targets. The protocol, which only came into force in 2005, set binding emission reduction targets only for industrialized countries, based on the fact that they are responsible for most of the world`s high greenhouse gas emissions. The United States first signed the agreement, but never ratified it; President George W. Bush argued that the agreement would hurt the U.S. economy because developing countries such as China and India would not be included. In the absence of the participation of these three countries, the effectiveness of the treaty was limited, as its objectives covered only a small fraction of total global emissions. The authors of the agreement have set a withdrawal period that President Trump must follow – which prevents him from irreparably harming our climate. www.climatechangenews.com/2018/07/12/countries-yet-ratify-paris-agreement/ www.britannica.com/story/us-exits-paris-climate-agreement George Bush`s reasons for withdrawing, some of which are similar to Trump`s, have mainly referred to the U.S.

economy. He argued that there would not be enough environmental goods in the protocol compared to the economic exodus he would bring to the United States.